Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01556
Original file (PD2012 01556.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD 1201556       
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20130606
SEPARATION DATE: 20070220                



SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSgt/E-5 (3C051, Information Assurance Technician) medically separated for inflammatory arthritis. The CI had a long history of joint pain, with complaints of wrist pain as early as 1997, which later included pain in her knees, back and neck, along with swelling in her knees. Various conservative treatments were implemented throughout the years, including physical therapy, rest, medication, and chiropractic care. In 2006 the CI was referred to Rheumatology, where she was diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis. This condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of her Air Force Specialty (AFS) or physical fitness standards, so she was issued a P4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The arthritic condition, characterized as “inflammatory arthritis” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated “inflammatory arthritis” as unfitting and rated 20% IAW Department of Defense (DoD) and Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) guidelines. The PEB also found “tobacco abuse” and “obesity, BMI 33.07” as Category III conditions (not separately unfitting). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated with that 20% Service disability rating.


CI CONTENTION: “My initial rating was given for "One or Two exacerbations a year in a well-established diagnosis." This should be changed as anyone who has been diagnosed with RA would have a lesser amount of exacerbations after diagnosis as they would have been treated. What the rating fails to recognize is the multiple exacerbations prior to diagnosis. Upon review of my records you will find multiple medical appointments for swelling of the knee. I also had multiple appointments for pain and swelling in my hands, which were written off as Carpal Tunnel because I was a computer operator. I later learned that I was never actually tested for Carpal Tunnel. Each knee appointment should be considered and incapacitating exacerbation, as I was unable to run, squat, jump or stand for more than 15 minutes. With some of these exacerbations I was put on a profile, sent to physical therapy and given Motrin. Usually within a week or two of the profile ending the swelling would return. At one point I asked my doctor not to put me on a profile, as I needed to prepare for my PT test, the alternatives they gave me were ineffective. At no time did any of my doctors recommend looking further into it. It wasn't until the pain got so bad that my supervisor insisted I request my doctor send me to a specialist. The orthopedic surgeon did X-rays' and MRI's and did find a synovial cyst. He was unconcerned with the cyst, however, he was concerned with the number of times my knee had swollen and recommended I see a rheumatologist. During one of my appointments my knee was exacerbated, and the doctor took about 60cc's of fluid from it. I was also given a Cortizone injection and told that should help for a few months, it lasted only a few days. When the lab work came back for the fluid from my knee, I was finally diagnosed with Sero-Negative Arthritis. I was put up for a medical review board and after fighting for my career I was separated with only 20% as by this time I had been on medication for a few months and it was now a well established diagnosis.” [sic]


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The Service rating for the unfitting inflammatory arthritis condition is addressed below; no other conditions meet the criteria for board consideration. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review remain eligible for consideration by the Service Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service PEB – Dated 20061030
 VA – CI did not consent to release VA records
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Inflammatory Arthritis 5009 20% Not Available
Tobacco Abuse Cat III
Obesity, BMI 33.07 Cat III
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
Combined: 20%
 Combined: Unknown
Derived from email contact with CI indicating no consent to release VA records .


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Inflammatory Arthritis. In 1997, the CI presented with right wrist pain and numbness which was diagnosed and treated as an extensor tendonitis. In 1999, she then presented with left wrist pain and a right fifth digit deformity. She was treated conservatively and diagnosed with carpal tunnel. In 2000, she presented with right knee after an injury. X-ray evaluation demonstrated a knee effusion, but was otherwise negative. In 2001, she presented with bilateral knee pain. The CI’s symptoms evolved to include pain in the digits, foot, neck, and back accompanied by occasional swelling and morning stiffness. The CI was evaluated and treated by chiropractor, orthopedics, physical therapy, and rheumatology. Her diagnoses included tendonitis of the wrist, bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, chronic knee and wrist pain, backache, and cervicalgia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study of the right knee, June 2006, eight months before separation, suggested inflammatory arthropathy. There were no significant degenerative changes, no fractures, and no evidence of ligamentous abnormalities. In June 2006, an orthopedic evaluation revealed full range of motion of the right knee with signs of inflammation; the CI was referred to rheumatology for right knee and hand pain with swelling. Rheumatology consultation, September 2006, diagnosed seronegative inflammatory arthritis. Laboratory studies were normal (ESR, RF, ANA, HLA B27). At the MEB/NARSUM, 14 September 2006, approximately five months prior to separation, the CI reported the intermittent use of wrist brace for symptom relief, difficulty climbing stairs and standing for long periods of time. She reported significant improvement with medication and indicated her symptoms did not limit her job performance (computer operator). The NARSUM physical examination documented tenderness of the first digit joint, right hand swelling, non-tender wrists, and ROM was “good.” The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the condition 20% coded 5009 (arthritis, other), which requires ratings under the rheumatoid arthritis code 5002. The CI did not consent to VA medical record release; therefore, the Board’s analysis was confined to the evidence at hand. A higher rating of 40% under this code requires documented evidence of definite health impairment or 3 or more incapacitating exacerbations a year. Although her profile restricted lifting more than 15 pounds, prolonged standing, running, sit ups, pushups, squatting, and jumping, the Commander’s statement indicated the CI’s condition had not interfered with the performance of her daily duties and required only a half day of missed work every 4-6 weeks. There was no evidence in the treatment record of prescribed quarters for her condition. A careful review of the treatment records did not support a higher rating because there was no evidence of definite health impairment or a sufficient number of incapacitating exacerbation to meet the 40% criteria. There was no radiographic finding of any joint pathology, no evidence of ratable peripheral neuropathy, and no compensable limitation in motion. The Board considered the application of §4.40, functional loss and agreed it was not applicable in this case. There were no other applicable VARSD coding options to rate the condition. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the inflammatory arthritis condition.



BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the inflammatory arthritis condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Condition 5009 20%
COMBINED 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120824, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record



                          
         XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
         Director of Operations
         Physical Disability Board of Review












SAF/MRB
1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700
Joint Base Andrews, MD 20762


Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX :

          Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2012-01556.
         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.
         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.
                                                               Sincerely,





 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings


Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02628

    Original file (PD-2013-02628.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    While deployed to Iraq, the CI reported a flare of skin rash affecting his hands at the time he experience hand swelling and joint pain.A clinic record entry on 6 May 2003 recorded psoriasis of the scalp, hands, feet and elbow for the preceding 25 days treated with topical medication. I would say this is 90% better then when flared off of Enbrel.”The Board first considered whether the psoriasis skin disease was separately unfitting for military service. Throughout the time from 1999 to the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00918

    Original file (PD 2012 00918.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. Painful Feet Condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Painful...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01223

    Original file (PD-2013-01223.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) / VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left knee X-rays on 11 April 2003 were normal. Knee ROM was extension-flexion of 0-125degrees (normal 0-140), limited by pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01236

    Original file (PD 2012 01236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the RA condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The examiner noted swelling and tenderness of wrists as well as hands, knees, ankles, feet, and decreased strength testing, (2/5) due to extremely painful joint movement. The PEB and VA both coded the RA as 5002 (arthritis rheumatoid) and rated it 20% using the service treatment records (STRs).

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01046

    Original file (PD2011-01046.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded rheumatoid arthritis to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. The PEB adjudicated the rheumatoid arthritis condition as unfitting, rated 20% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The examiner concluded: “Although she is capable of performing her duties within her MOS, she cannot participate sufficiently in field training and is non-deployable, her overall performance of duty as a soldier...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01365

    Original file (PD-2013-01365.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At retention physical dated 4 September 2002, the examiner documented a prior history of bilateral hip osteoarthritis, a 2001 right hip replacement, and noted “decreased ROM left hip” (no measurements were documented). Thus, the Board cannot recommend a separate service rating for this condition. In the matter of the osteoarthritis bilateral knees condition, the Board unanimously determined that neither knee was separately unfitting and that the condition EPTS and was not permanently...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00732

    Original file (PD2011-00732.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    There was also swelling of the ankles noted. The Board noted that the VA subsequently rated the joints individually on the 23 November 2011 decision, over 4 years after separation and considered whether there were chronic residuals at the time of separation warranting rating separate from the arthritis condition. The Board considered the final rheumatologic examination, three months prior to separation, which documented excellent control of her RA with “no signs of active synovitis”, and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01992

    Original file (PD-2013-01992.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Review of the available service treatment record revealed that the CI first developed joint symptoms in April 2003.She presented in September 2003 with complaints of morning stiffness and pain and swelling of her hands wrists and shoulders. This was the approach taken by the VA, who assigned separate 10% ratings under a combination 6350-5002 code (5002 – rheumatoid arthritis) for each wrist and each hand (identified as right finger joints and left finger joints, or “group of minor joints”)....

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00067

    Original file (PD2010-00067.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB rated OIA under the VASRD coded 5009 (arthritis, other types) at a disability rating of 20%; for two or more major joints or two or more minor joint groups, with occasional incapacitating exacerbations. Right Shoulder Condition. Since the rotator cuff tear was old, the Board determined that the recent right shoulder flare up was probably due to the arthritis, had resolved with medication prior to separation.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00657

    Original file (PD2009-00657.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined unfit for continued Naval service, and separated at a 20% combined disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Naval and Department of Defense regulations. The Board rates unfitting conditions based on the medical evidence of functional impairment IAW the VASRD. Prior to 2008 the military service PEBs generally did not recognize pain limited range of motion or painful...